Description: In the official visionOS 26 Hover Effect sample code project , I encountered an issue where the event.trackingAreaIdentifier returned by onSpatialEvent does not reset as expected. Steps to Reproduce: Select an object with trackingAreaID = 6 in the sample app. Look at a blank space (outside any tracking area) and perform a pinch gesture . Expected Behavior: The event.trackingAreaIdentifier should return 0 when interacting with a non-tracking area. Actual Behavior: The event.trackingAreaIdentifier still returns 6, even after restarting the app or killing the process. This persists regardless of where the pinch gesture is performed

Hi , My application meet below crash backtrace at very low repro rate from the public users, i do not see it relate to a specific iOS version or iPhone model. The last code line from my application is calling CAMetalLayer nextDrawable API. I did some basic studying, suppose it may relate to the wrong CAMetaLayer configuration, like frame property w or h <= 0.0 bounds property w or h <= 0.0 drawableSize w or h <= 0.0 or w or h > max value (like 16384) Not sure my above thinking is right or not? Will the UIView which my CAMetaLayer attached will cause such nextDrawable crash or not ? Thanks a lot Main Thread - Crashed libsystem_kernel.dylib __pthread_kill libsystem_c.dylib abort libsystem_c.dylib __assert_rtn Metal MTLReportFailure.cold.1 Metal MTLReportFailure Metal _MTLMessageContextEnd Metal -[MTLTextureDescriptorInternal validateWithDevice:] AGXMetalA13 0x245b1a000 + 4522096 QuartzCore allocate_drawable_texture(id<MTLDevice>, __IOSurface*, unsigned int, unsigned int, MTLPixelFormat, unsigned long long, CAMetalLayerRotation, bool, NSString*, unsigned long) QuartzCore get_unused_drawable(_CAMetalLayerPrivate*, CAMetalLayerRotation, bool, bool) QuartzCore CAMetalLayerPrivateNextDrawableLocked(CAMetalLayer*, CAMetalDrawable**, unsigned long*) QuartzCore -[CAMetalLayer nextDrawable] SpaceApp -[MetalRender renderFrame:] MetalRenderer.mm:167 SpaceApp -[FrameBuffer acceptFrame:] VideoRender.mm:173 QuartzCore CA::Display::DisplayLinkItem::dispatch_(CA::SignPost::Interval<(CA::SignPost::CAEventCode)835322056>&) QuartzCore CA::Display::DisplayLink::dispatch_items(unsigned long long, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) QuartzCore CA::Display::DisplayLink::dispatch_deferred_display_links(unsigned int) UIKitCore _UIUpdateSequenceRun UIKitCore schedulerStepScheduledMainSection UIKitCore runloopSourceCallback CoreFoundation __CFRUNLOOP_IS_CALLING_OUT_TO_A_SOURCE0_PERFORM_FUNCTION__ CoreFoundation __CFRunLoopDoSource0 CoreFoundation __CFRunLoopDoSources0 CoreFoundation __CFRunLoopRun CoreFoundation CFRunLoopRunSpecific GraphicsServices GSEventRunModal UIKitCore -[UIApplication _run] UIKitCore UIApplicationMain

Hello, I'm tracking down a bug where useResource doesn't seem to apply proper synchronization when a resource is produced by the render pass then consumed by the compute pass, but when I use MTLFence between the to signal and wait between the render/compute encoders, the artifact goes away. The resource is created with MTLHazardTrackingModeTracked and useResource is called on the compute encoder after the render pass. Metal API Validation doesn't report any warnings/errors. Am I misunderstanding the difference between the two APIs? I dug through the Metal documentation and it looks like useResource should handle synchronization given the resource has MTLHazardTrackingModeTracked but on the other hand, MTLFence should be used to ensure proper synchronization between command encoders. Can someone can clarify the difference between the two APIs and when to use them.

Hi there, Is it possible to customize the Metal Performance HUD on Apple TV, similar to how it can be done on iPhone & iPad? Would like to see things like Compiled Shaders for my Apps on tvOS .

I mean…I want to use defaults rather than launching apps via open with the saved environment variables. This is pretty easy on iOS and other platforms. So what about in macOS?

I am trying to learn the new Metal Peformance Primitives APIs. I have added the MetalPeformancePrimitives framework and included the header in my shader code as per documentation #include <MetalPeformancePrimitives/MetalPeformancePrimitives.h> Unfortunately, Xcode complains that the header cannot be found. How do I include it properly? I am using Xcode 26 on Tahoe. The MetalPeformancePrimitives framework is present on my machine and I can inspect the headers in the filesystem.

I work on a Qt/QML app that uses Esri Maps SDK for Qt and that is deployed to both Windows and iPads. With a recent iPad OS upgrade to 26.1, many iPad users are reporting the application freezing after panning and/or identifying features in the map. It runs fine for our Windows users. I was able to reproduce this and grabbed the following error messages when the freeze happens: IOGPUMetalError: Caused GPU Address Fault Error (0000000b:kIOGPUCommandBufferCallbackErrorPageFault) IOGPUMetalError: Invalid Resource (00000009:kIOGPUCommandBufferCallbackErrorInvalidResource) Environment: Qt 6.5.4 (Qt for iOS) Esri Maps SDK for Qt 200.3 iPadOS 26.1 Because it appears to be a Metal error, I tried using OpenGL (Qt offers a way to easily set hte target graphics api): QQuickWindow::setGraphicsApi(QSGRendererInterface::GraphicsApi::OpenGL) Which worked! No more freezing. But I'm seeing many posts that OpenGL has been deprecated by Apple. I've seen posts that Apple deprecated OpenGL ES. But it seems to still be available with iPadOS 26.1. If so, will this fix (above) just cause problems with a future iPadOS update? Any other suggestions to address this issue? Upgrading our version of Qt + Esri SDK to the latest version is not an option for us. We are in the process to upgrade the full application, but it is a year or two out. So, we just need a fix to buy us some time for now. Appreciate any thoughts/insights....

I noticed that when the render command encoder adds no draw calls an apps memory usage seems to grow unboundedly. Using a super simple MTKView-based drawing with the following delegate (code at end). If I add the simplest of draw calls, e.g., a single vertex, the app's memory usage is normal, around 100-ish MBs. I am attaching a couple screenshot, one from Xcode and one from Instruments. What's going on here? Is this an illegal program? If yes, why does it not crash, such as if the encode or command buffer weren't ended. Or is there some race condition at play here due to the lack of draws? class Renderer: NSObject, MTKViewDelegate { var device: MTLDevice var commandQueue: MTL4CommandQueue var commandBuffer: MTL4CommandBuffer var allocator: MTL4CommandAllocator override init() { guard let d = MTLCreateSystemDefaultDevice(), let queue = d.makeMTL4CommandQueue(), let cmdBuffer = d.makeCommandBuffer(), let alloc = d.makeCommandAllocator() else { fatalError("unable to create metal 4 objects") } self.device = d self.commandQueue = queue self.commandBuffer = cmdBuffer self.allocator = alloc super.init() } func mtkView(_ view: MTKView, drawableSizeWillChange size: CGSize) {} func draw(in view: MTKView) { guard let drawable = view.currentDrawable else { return } commandBuffer.beginCommandBuffer(allocator: allocator) guard let descriptor = view.currentMTL4RenderPassDescriptor, let encoder = commandBuffer.makeRenderCommandEncoder( descriptor: descriptor ) else { fatalError("unable to create encoder") } encoder.endEncoding() commandBuffer.endCommandBuffer() commandQueue.waitForDrawable(drawable) commandQueue.commit([commandBuffer]) commandQueue.signalDrawable(drawable) drawable.present() } }

Unable to find intelgpu_kbl_gt2r0 slice or a compatible one in binary archive 'file:///System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/IconRendering.framework/Resources/binary.metallib' available slices: applegpu_g13g, applegpu_g13s, applegpu_g13d, applegpu_g14g, applegpu_g14s, applegpu_g14d, applegpu_g15g, applegpu_g15s, applegpu_g15d, applegpu_g16g, applegpu_g16s, applegpu_g17g, applegpu_g15g, applegpu_g15s, applegpu_g15d, applegpu_g16s Is it related to performance of applications in macOS 26.2 on Intel Macs?

My app is running Compute Shaders that use non-uniform thread groups. When I run the app in the debugger with a simulator target the app crashes on encoder.dispatchThreads and the error message is: Dispatch Threads with Non-Uniform Threadgroup Size is not supported on this device. Previously the log output states that: Metal Shader Validation is unsupported for Simulator. However: When I stop the debugger and just run the app in the simulator without the debugger attached, the app just runs fine and does not crash. The SwiftUI Preview that also triggers the Compute Shader when preparing data also just runs fine without a crash. I can run and debug on a real device no problem - I just don't have all sizes available. Is there anything I need to check in my lldb/simulator configuration? It obviously does work, just the debugger cannot really deal with it? Any input would be nice as this really slows my down as I have to be extremely careful when debugging on the simulator.

I notice some metal-cpp classes have static funtion like static URL* fileURLWithPath(const class String* pPath); static class ComputePassDescriptor* computePassDescriptor(); static class AccelerationStructurePassDescriptor* accelerationStructurePassDescriptor(); which return a new object. these classes also provide 'alloc' and 'init' function to create object by default. for object created by 'alloc' and 'init', I use something like NS::Shaderd_Ptr or call release directly to free memory. Because 'alloc' and 'init' not explicit call on these static function. I wonder how to correctly free object created by these static function? did they managed by autorelease pool?

I'm implementing optimized matmul on metal: https://github.com/crynux-ai/metal-matmul/blob/main/metal/1_shared_mem.metal I notice that performance is significantly different with different threadgroup memory set in [computeEncoder setThreadgroupMemoryLength] All other lines are exactly same, the only difference is this parameter. Matmul performance is roughly 250 GFLops if I set 32768 (max bytes allowed on this M1 Max), but 400 GFLops if I set 8192. Why does this happen? How can I optimize it?

The game physics work as expected using GTPK 2.0 using Crossover 24 or Whisky. However, using GPTK 2.1 with Crossover 25, the player and camera physics misbehave. See https://www.reddit.com/r/WWEGames/comments/1jx9mph/the_siamese_elbow/ and https://www.reddit.com/r/WWEGames/comments/1jx9ow4/camera_glitch/ Full video also linked in the Reddit post. I have also submitted this bug via the feedback assistant.

Hello, Thank you for attending today’s Metal & game technologies group lab at WWDC25! We were delighted to answer many questions from developers and energized by the community engagement. We hope you enjoyed it and welcome your feedback. We invite you to carry on the conversation here, particularly if your question appeared in Slido and we were unable to answer it during the lab. If your question received feedback let us know if you need clarification. You may want to ask your question again in a different lab e.g. visionOS tomorrow. (We realize that this can be confusing when frameworks interoperate) We have a lot to learn from each other so let’s get to Q&A and make the best of WWDC25! 😃 Looking forward to your questions posted in new threads.

Hi, What's the best way to handle drastic changes in scene charateristics with the new MTLFXTemporalDenoisedScaler? Let's say a visible object of the scene radically changes its material properties. I can modify the albedo and roughness textures consequently. But I suspect the history will be corrupted. Blending visual information between the new frame and the previous ones might be a nonsense. I guess the problem should be the same when objects appear or disappear instantly. Is the upsacler manage these events for us (by lowering blending), or should we use the reactive or the denoise strength mask or something like that to handle them?

Im new in the Mac area but for sure not UE. Windows is a long process to packaging but it could be done. All the documentation for Epic and from the internet is basically non existent with exactly how to package a project within UE. I have Xcode installed which makes sense, agreed to terms and install for MacOS, I've been able to make a project for several weeks now and want to package for a test run for my friends to play on Windows. Now I just get this in the log: UATHelper: Packaging (Mac): ERROR: Failed to finalize the .app with Xcode. Check the log for more information UATHelper: Packaging (Mac): Trace written to file /Users/rileysleger/Library/Logs/Unreal Engine/LocalBuildLogs/UBA-ProjectNightTerror-Mac-Development.uba with size 12.6kb UATHelper: Packaging (Mac): Total time in Unreal Build Accelerator local executor: 8.12 seconds UATHelper: Packaging (Mac): Result: Failed (OtherCompilationError) UATHelper: Packaging (Mac): Total execution time: 9.71 seconds PackagingResults: Error: Failed to finalize the .app with Xcode. Check the log for more information UATHelper: Packaging (Mac): Took 9.77s to run dotnet, ExitCode=6 UATHelper: Packaging (Mac): UnrealBuildTool failed. See log for more details. (/Users/rileysleger/Library/Logs/Unreal Engine/LocalBuildLogs/UBA-ProjectNightTerror-Mac-Development.txt) UATHelper: Packaging (Mac): AutomationTool executed for 0h 0m 10s UATHelper: Packaging (Mac): AutomationTool exiting with ExitCode=6 (6) UATHelper: Packaging (Mac): RunUAT ERROR: AutomationTool was unable to run successfully. Exited with code: 6 PackagingResults: Error: AutomationTool was unable to run successfully. Exited with code: 6 PackagingResults: Error: Unknown Error This absolutely makes no sense to me. Anyone have ideas?

The sample code here, has code like: // Create a display link capable of being used with all active displays cvReturn = CVDisplayLinkCreateWithActiveCGDisplays(&_displayLink); But that function's doc says it's deprecated and to use NSView/NSWindow/NSScreen displayLink instead. That returns CADisplayLink, not CVDisplayLink. Also the documentation for that displayLink method is completely empty. I'm not sure if I'm supposed to add it to run loop, or what, after I get it. It would be nice to get an updated version of this sample project and/or have some documentation in NSView.displayLink

I am using Unreal Engine 5.6 on a MacBook Pro with an M3 chip and macOS 15.5. I’ve installed Xcode and accepted the license, but Unreal is not detecting the latest Metal Shader Standard (Metal v3.0). The maximum version Unreal sees is Metal v2.4, even though the hardware and OS should support Metal 3.0. I’ve also run sudo xcode-select -s /Applications/Xcode.app and accepted the license via Terminal. Is there anything in Xcode settings, SDK availability, or system permissions that could be preventing access to Metal 3.0 features?"

Hello! I'm developing a GPU (shader) language, where I aim to target multiple backends with a common frontend. I wanted to avoid having to round trip through Metal, and go straight to IR just like I have with SPIRV, in order to have a fast and efficient compilation process. I've been looking for a reference page where I can read about Metals IR, and as far as I'm aware, it exists, but I can't seem to find it anywhere. Furthermore, if such a reference is available, is there also a toolkit where I can run validation on the output IR, and perhaps even run optimizations, much like spv-tools for SPIRV? Any help would be appreciated! Thanks, Gustav

Our APP has integrated 3D function, in order to reduce the memory occupation of the APP in the background, we will uninstall the 3D after the APP enters the background. However, the uninstall also causes problems. When the uninstall process is executed in the background, the app will briefly trigger the background GPU rendering error warning with the error warning code: OGPUMetalError: Insufficient Permission (to submit GPU work from background) (00000006:kIOGPUCommandBufferCallbackErrorBackgroundExecutionNotPermitted) Execution of the command buffer was aborted due to an error during execution. Insufficient Permission (to submit GPU Work from background) (00000006: kIOGPUCommandBufferCallbackErrorBackgroundExecutionNotPermitted) excuse me this warning system will tighten APP permissions background?​ For example, limit or shorten the background survival time of the APP. In addition, will the background refresh function fail, resulting in the failure of Bluetooth Ibeacon activation?