We have a setup where the system uses proxy settings configured via a PAC file. We are investigating how NWConnection behaves inside a Network Extension (NETransparentProxyProvider) with a transparent proxy configuration based on this PAC file. Scenario: The browser makes a connection which the PAC file resolves as "DIRECT" (bypassing the proxy) Our Network Extension intercepts this traffic for analysis The extension creates a new connection using NWConnection to the original remote address. The issue: despite the PAC file’s "DIRECT" decision, NWConnection still respects the system proxy settings and routes the connection through the proxy. Our questions: Is it correct that NWConnection always uses the system proxy if configured ? Does setting preferNoProxies = true guarantee bypassing the system proxy? Additionally: Whitelisting IPs in the Network Extension to avoid interception is not a viable solution because IPs may correspond to multiple services, and the extension only sees IP addresses, not domains (e.g., we want to skip scanning meet.google.com traffic but still scan other Google services on the same IP range). Are there any recommended approaches or best practices to ensure that connections initiated from a Network Extension can truly bypass the proxy (for example, for specific IP ranges or domains)?

Hi all, We've been exploring the capabilities of the Network.framework for peer-to-peer communication and have run into some behavior that we haven't been able to fully explain with the existing documentation. In our tests, we’re working with 12 iOS devices, all disconnected from Wi-Fi to force communication over Apple Wireless Direct Link (AWDL). While using the Network.framework to create peer-to-peer connections, we observed that the number of connected peers never exceeded 8, despite all 12 devices being active and configured identically. Some questions we’re hoping to get clarification or discussion on: Is there a known upper limit to the number of peer-to-peer connections supported via AWDL? Are there conditions under which the framework or system limits or throttles visible peers? Does AWDL behavior vary by hardware model, iOS version, or backgrounding state of the app? Is there any official documentation or guidance around peer discovery or connection limits when using NWBrowser and NWConnection in a peer-to-peer context? We’d appreciate any insights from the Apple engineering team or other developers who have worked with larger peer groups using Network.framework in peer-to-peer mode.

Hi, We're in the process of following Apple’s guidance on transitioning away from Packet Filter (pf) and migrating to a Network Extension-based solution that functions as a firewall. During this transition, we've encountered several limitations with the current Content Filter API and wanted to share our findings. Our VPN client relies on firewall functionality to enforce strict adherence to split tunneling rules defined via the routing table. This ensures that no traffic leaks outside the VPN tunnel, which is critical for our users for a variety of reasons. To enforce this, our product currently uses interface-scoped rules to block all non-VPN traffic outside the tunnel. Replicating this behavior with the Content Filter API (NEFilterDataProvider) appears to be infeasible today. The key limitation we've encountered is that the current Content Filter API does not expose information about the network interface associated with a flow. As a workaround, we considered using the flow’s local endpoint IP to infer the interface, but this data is not available until after returning a verdict to peek into the flow’s data—at which point the connection has already been established. This can result in connection metadata leaking outside the tunnel, which may contain sensitive information depending on the connection. What is the recommended approach for this use case? NEFilterPacketProvider? This may work, but it has a negative impact on network performance. Using a Packet Tunnel Provider and purely relying on enforceRoutes? Would this indeed ensure that no traffic can leak by targeting a specific interface or by using a second VPN extension? And more broadly—especially if no such approach is currently feasible with the existing APIs—we're interpreting TN3165 as a signal that pf should be considered deprecated and may not be available in the next major macOS release. Is that a reasonable interpretation?

I have written an App which extracts data, over WiFi, from an instrument that creates its own WiFi Hotspot. The instrument provides no internet connection. The iPad version of this App is connects fine and is assigned an IP address by DHCP server running on a MicroChip RN171 wifi module. iOS assigns an obscure IP address on a completely different subnet. I understand this is iOS' way of "Complaining" that is wasn't assigned an IP address. Consequently in the case of the iPhone I am forced to manually assign an IP address for the iPhone, the mask and the gateway. Only then is the connection successful. Anyone know why the iPhone won't talk DHCP to a WiFi module not connected to the internet? Are there perhaps some parameters that I need to adjust on either the iPhone or WiFi module?

Hello everyone, I'm trying to figure out how to transmit a UIImage (png or tiff) securely to an application running in my desktop browser (Mac or PC). The desktop application and iOS app would potentially be running on the same local network (iOS hotspot or something) or have no internet connection at all. I'm trying to securely send over an image that the running desktop app could ingest. I was thinking something like a local server securely accepting image data from an iPhone. Any suggestions ideas or where to look for more info would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for your help.

I have read all the information and forum posts about local network, such as TN3179, etc., and have added NSLocalNetworkUsageDescription, but it does not solve my problem. The problem I encountered is described as follows: Device: iOS18.1.1 Signing method: automatic Xcode debug directly runs, and the app can access 17.25.11.128 normally. However, relase run or packaged into adhoc installation, this IP cannot be accessed. There is a phenomenon that the app package of the App Store can also be used. Our test team has few iOS18+ devices, and internal testing is not possible. Please contact us as soon as possible, thank you. ======= 我已经了解了所有关于local network 相关的资料和论坛帖子，比如TN3179 等等， 已经添加了 NSLocalNetworkUsageDescription， 但是不解决我的问题。 我遇到的问题描述如下： 设备：iOS18.1.1 签名方式：自动 xcode debug 直接运行，app是可以正常访问17.25.11.128的。 但是 relase run 或者 打包成 adhoc 安装，就无法访问这个IP了。 有一个现象， App Store 的app包 也是可以的。 我们的测试团队，iOS18+的设备就没几个，还不能内部测试了。请尽快联系我们，谢谢。

i unfortunatly upgraded to Sequoia since then I see when: i select XCode ->Product->run i see Error: No route to host i cannot grant access to local network for XCode i can no longer debug my program as i did with Sonora

As a third-party application on Apple Watch, can it be located in the same LAN httpServer? Currently, when testing to initiate an http request in the LAN, the connection timeout is returned, code: -1001 self.customSession.request("http://10.15.48.191:9000/hello").response { response in switch response.result { case .success(let data): dlog("✅ 请求成功，收到数据：") if let html = String(data: data ?? Data(), encoding: .utf8) { dlog(html) } case .failure(let error): dlog("❌ 请求失败：\(error.localizedDescription)") } } 执行后报错 Task <B71BE820-FD0E-4880-A6DD-1F8F6EAF98B0>.<1> finished with error [-1001] Error Domain=NSURLErrorDomain Code=-1001 "请求超时。" UserInfo={_kCFStreamErrorCodeKey=-2102, _NSURLErrorFailingURLSessionTaskErrorKey=LocalDataTask <B71BE820-FD0E-4880-A6DD-1F8F6EAF98B0>.<1>, _NSURLErrorRelatedURLSessionTaskErrorKey=( "LocalDataTask <B71BE820-FD0E-4880-A6DD-1F8F6EAF98B0>.<1>", "LocalDataPDTask <B71BE820-FD0E-4880-A6DD-1F8F6EAF98B0>.<1>", "LocalDataTask <B71BE820-FD0E-4880-A6DD-1F8F6EAF98B0>.<1>" ), NSLocalizedDescription=请求超时。, _kCFStreamErrorDomainKey=4, NSErrorFailingURLStringKey=http://10.15.48.191:9000/hello, NSErrorFailingURLKey=http://10.15.48.191:9000/hello}

Hello there, Starting from iOS 18.4, support was included for QWAC Validation and QCStatements. Using the official QWAC Validator at: https://eidas.ec.europa.eu/efda/qwac-validation-tool I was able to check that the domain "eidas.ec.europa.eu" has a valid QWAC certificate. However, when trying to obtain the same result using the new API, I do not obtain the same result. Here is my sample playground code: import Foundation import Security import PlaygroundSupport PlaygroundPage.current.needsIndefiniteExecution = true @MainActor class CertificateFetcher: NSObject, URLSessionDelegate { private let url: URL init(url: URL) { self.url = url super.init() } func start() { let session = URLSession(configuration: .ephemeral, delegate: self, delegateQueue: nil) let task = session.dataTask(with: url) { data, response, error in if let error = error { print("Error during request: \(error)") } else { print("Request completed.") } } task.resume() } nonisolated func urlSession(_ session: URLSession, didReceive challenge: URLAuthenticationChallenge, completionHandler: @escaping (URLSession.AuthChallengeDisposition, URLCredential?) -&gt; Void) { guard let trust = challenge.protectionSpace.serverTrust else { completionHandler(.cancelAuthenticationChallenge, nil) return } if let certificates = SecTrustCopyCertificateChain(trust) as? [SecCertificate] { self.checkQWAC(certificates: certificates) } let credential = URLCredential(trust: trust) completionHandler(.useCredential, credential) } nonisolated func checkQWAC(certificates: [SecCertificate]) { let policy = SecPolicyCreateSSL(true, nil) var trust: SecTrust? guard SecTrustCreateWithCertificates(certificates as CFArray, policy, &amp;trust) == noErr, let trust else { print("Unable to create SecTrust") return } var error: CFError? guard SecTrustEvaluateWithError(trust, &amp;error) else { print("Trust evaluation failed") return } guard let result = SecTrustCopyResult(trust) as? [String : Any] else { print("No result dictionary") return } let qwacStatus = result[kSecTrustQWACValidation as String] let qcStatements = result[kSecTrustQCStatements as String] print("QWAC Status: \(String(describing: qwacStatus))") print("QC Statements: \(String(describing: qcStatements))") } } let url = URL(string: "https://eidas.ec.europa.eu/")! let fetcher = CertificateFetcher(url: url) fetcher.start() Which prints: QWAC Status: nil QC Statements: nil Request completed. Am I making a mistake while using the Security framework? I would greatly appreciate any help or guidance you can provide.

We are implementing a connection between iPad and iPhone devices using LocalPushConnectivity, and have introduced SimplePushProvider into the project. We will have it switch between roles of Server and Client within a single project. ※ iPad will be Server and the iPhone will be Client. Communication between Server and Client is via TLS, with Server reading p12 file and Client setting public key. Currently, a TLS error code of "-9836" (invalid protocol version) is occurring when communicating from Client's SimplePushProvider to Server. I believe that Client is sending TLS1.3, and Server is set to accept TLS1.2 to 1.3. Therefore, I believe that the actual error is not due to TLS protocol version, but is an error that is related to security policy or TLS communication setting. Example: P12 file does not meet some requirement NWProtocolTLS.Options setting is insufficient etc... I'm not sure what the problem is, so please help. For reference, I will attach you implementation of TLS communication settings. P12 file is self-signed and was created by exporting it from Keychain Access. Test environment: iPad (OS: 16.6) iPhone (OS: 18.3.2) ConnectionOptions: TLS communication settings public enum ConnectionOptions { public enum TCP { public static var options: NWProtocolTCP.Options { let options = NWProtocolTCP.Options() options.noDelay = true options.enableFastOpen return options } } public enum TLS { public enum Error: Swift.Error { case invalidP12 case unableToExtractIdentity case unknown } public class Server { public let p12: URL public let passphrase: String public init(p12 url: URL, passphrase: String) { self.p12 = url self.passphrase = passphrase } public var options: NWProtocolTLS.Options? { guard let data = try? Data(contentsOf: p12) else { return nil } let pkcs12Options = [kSecImportExportPassphrase: passphrase] var importItems: CFArray? let status = SecPKCS12Import(data as CFData, pkcs12Options as CFDictionary, &amp;importItems) guard status == errSecSuccess, let items = importItems as? [[String: Any]], let importItemIdentity = items.first?[kSecImportItemIdentity as String], let identity = sec_identity_create(importItemIdentity as! SecIdentity) else { return nil } let options = NWProtocolTLS.Options() sec_protocol_options_set_min_tls_protocol_version(options.securityProtocolOptions, .TLSv12) sec_protocol_options_set_max_tls_protocol_version(options.securityProtocolOptions, .TLSv13) sec_protocol_options_set_local_identity(options.securityProtocolOptions, identity) sec_protocol_options_append_tls_ciphersuite(options.securityProtocolOptions, tls_ciphersuite_t.RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) return options } } public class Client { public let publicKeyHash: String private let dispatchQueue = DispatchQueue(label: "ConnectionParameters.TLS.Client.dispatchQueue") public init(publicKeyHash: String) { self.publicKeyHash = publicKeyHash } // Attempt to verify the pinned certificate. public var options: NWProtocolTLS.Options { let options = NWProtocolTLS.Options() sec_protocol_options_set_min_tls_protocol_version(options.securityProtocolOptions, .TLSv12) sec_protocol_options_set_max_tls_protocol_version(options.securityProtocolOptions, .TLSv13) sec_protocol_options_set_verify_block( options.securityProtocolOptions, verifyClosure, dispatchQueue ) return options } private func verifyClosure( secProtocolMetadata: sec_protocol_metadata_t, secTrust: sec_trust_t, secProtocolVerifyComplete: @escaping sec_protocol_verify_complete_t ) { let trust = sec_trust_copy_ref(secTrust).takeRetainedValue() guard let serverPublicKeyData = publicKey(from: trust) else { secProtocolVerifyComplete(false) return } let keyHash = cryptoKitSHA256(data: serverPublicKeyData) guard keyHash == publicKeyHash else { // Presented certificate doesn't match. secProtocolVerifyComplete(false) return } // Presented certificate matches the pinned cert. secProtocolVerifyComplete(true) } private func cryptoKitSHA256(data: Data) -&gt; String { let rsa2048Asn1Header: [UInt8] = [ 0x30, 0x82, 0x01, 0x22, 0x30, 0x0d, 0x06, 0x09, 0x2a, 0x86, 0x48, 0x86, 0xf7, 0x0d, 0x01, 0x01, 0x01, 0x05, 0x00, 0x03, 0x82, 0x01, 0x0f, 0x00 ] let data = Data(rsa2048Asn1Header) + data let hash = SHA256.hash(data: data) return Data(hash).base64EncodedString() } private func publicKey(from trust: SecTrust) -&gt; Data? { guard let certificateChain = SecTrustCopyCertificateChain(trust) as? [SecCertificate], let serverCertificate = certificateChain.first else { return nil } let publicKey = SecCertificateCopyKey(serverCertificate) return SecKeyCopyExternalRepresentation(publicKey!, nil)! as Data } } } }

Hello, I have encountered an issue with an iPhone 15PM with iOS 18.5. The NSHTTPCookieStorage failed to clear cookies, but even after clearing them, I was still able to retrieve them. However, on the same system It is normal on iPhone 14PM. I would like to know the specific reason and whether there are any adaptation related issues. Following code: NSHTTPCookie *cookie; NSHTTPCookieStorage *storage = [NSHTTPCookieStorage sharedHTTPCookieStorage]; for (cookie in [storage cookies]) { [storage deleteCookie:cookie]; }

Hi! I'm working on a solution (iOS 18) that uses Network Extensions PacketTunnelProvider and Content Filter. Currently I'm trying to integrate it with another extension – DNSProxyProvider. My goal is to process dns queries and use resolved ips and names for additional routing inside of the packet tunnel. I'm running into a major issue: whenever both VPN and DNS proxy are active simultaneously, the device completely loses internet connectivity — no traffic goes through, and DNS resolution seems to stop working entirely. I know about the mdm supervision requirement to use DNSProxyProvider and that's covered as I work with a managed device and install a DNS proxy profile, here's how its .mobileconfig file looks like: The DNS proxy itself works fine when working by itself (without VPN being turned on), as I implemented it that it successfully processes DNS packets flows while collecting information about domains etc, and everything works perfectly. Problems begin when using VPN at the same time. I'm aware that tunnel settings include dns related options that can affect this, but I haven't had much luck with tweaking them. Here's how they look right now for reference: let settings: NEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings = NEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings(tunnelRemoteAddress: "240.0.0.1") // let dnsSettings = NEDNSSettings(servers: "8.8.8.8,8.8.4.4".components(separatedBy: ",")) // dnsSettings.matchDomains = [""] // settings.dnsSettings = dnsSettings settings.proxySettings = nil /* ipv4 settings */ let ipv4Settings = NEIPv4Settings(addresses: ["240.0.0.2"], subnetMasks: ["255.255.255.0"]) ipv4Settings.includedRoutes = [NEIPv4Route.default()] settings.ipv4Settings = ipv4Settings /* MTU */ settings.mtu = 1500 return settings I've tried excluding some dns related ip routes and dns settings shenanigans but nothing. I haven't found any information that might suggest that using both of these extensions at the same time doesn't work, on the contrary, this page in the official documentation about the expected use of packet tunnel provider the expected use of packet tunnel provider, as it talks about the fact that you should not use it for interception of all of DNS traffic, as the use of DNSPRoxyProvider (or dns settings) are built for that, which in my mind, suggests that there should be no problem with using them both and just splitting the dns traffic handling to the proxy. Will be thankful for any help!

Recently, we have observed that after upgrading to OS 15.4.1, some devices are experiencing network issues. We are using a Network Extension with a transparent app proxy in our product. The user encounters this issue while using our client, but the issue persists even after stopping the client app. This appears to be an OS issue. Below is the sytem logs. In the system logs, it says [C669.1 Hostname#546597df:443 failed transform (unsatisfied (No network route), flow divert agg: 2)] event: transform:children_failed @0.001s In scutil --dns, it says not reachble. DNS configuration resolver #1 flags : reach : 0x00000000 (Not Reachable) resolver #2 domain : local options : mdns timeout : 5 flags : reach : 0x00000000 (Not Reachable) order : 300000 resolver #3 domain : 254.169.in-addr.arpa options : mdns timeout : 5 flags : reach : 0x00000000 (Not Reachable) order : 300200 resolver #4 domain : 8.e.f.ip6.arpa options : mdns timeout : 5 flags : reach : 0x00000000 (Not Reachable) order : 300400 resolver #5 domain : 9.e.f.ip6.arpa options : mdns timeout : 5 flags : reach : 0x00000000 (Not Reachable) order : 300600 resolver #6 domain : a.e.f.ip6.arpa options : mdns timeout : 5 flags : reach : 0x00000000 (Not Reachable) order : 300800 resolver #7 domain : b.e.f.ip6.arpa options : mdns timeout : 5 flags : reach : 0x00000000 (Not Reachable) order : 301000 We need to restart the system to recover from the issue.

I need to know the https address of a certain page within my app. This is going to be used as a redirect URL. I don't think it is a good idea to use deep links because it has to be an https address. I don't think Universal Links will work because it is not my website that I will be communicating with.

I'm working on enabling a content filter in my iOS app using NEFilterManager and NEFilterProviderConfiguration. The setup works perfectly in debug builds when running via Xcode, but fails on TestFlight builds with the following error: **Failed to save filter settings: permission denied ** **Here is my current implementation: ** (void)startContentFilter { NSUserDefaults *userDefaults = [NSUserDefaults standardUserDefaults]; [userDefaults synchronize]; [[NEFilterManager sharedManager] loadFromPreferencesWithCompletionHandler:^(NSError * _Nullable error) { dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{ if (error) { NSLog(@"Failed to load filter: %@", error.localizedDescription); [self showAlertWithTitle:@"Error" message:[NSString stringWithFormat:@"Failed to load content filter: %@", error.localizedDescription]]; return; } NEFilterProviderConfiguration *filterConfig = [[NEFilterProviderConfiguration alloc] init]; filterConfig.filterSockets = YES; filterConfig.filterBrowsers = YES; NEFilterManager *manager = [NEFilterManager sharedManager]; manager.providerConfiguration = filterConfig; manager.enabled = YES; [manager saveToPreferencesWithCompletionHandler:^(NSError * _Nullable error) { dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{ if (error) { NSLog(@"Failed to save filter settings: %@", error.localizedDescription); [self showAlertWithTitle:@"Error" message:[NSString stringWithFormat:@"Failed to save filter settings: %@", error.localizedDescription]]; } else { NSLog(@"Content filter enabled successfully!"); [self showAlertWithTitle:@"Success" message:@"Content filter enabled successfully!"]; } }); }]; }); }]; } **What I've tried: ** Ensured the com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension entitlement is set in both the app and system extension. The Network extension target includes content-filter-provider. Tested only on physical devices. App works in development build, but not from TestFlight. **My questions: ** Why does saveToPreferencesWithCompletionHandler fail with “permission denied” on TestFlight? Are there special entitlements required for using NEFilterManager in production/TestFlight builds? Is MDM (Mobile Device Management) required to deploy apps using content filters? Has anyone successfully implemented NEFilterProviderConfiguration in production, and if so, how?

Goal : Block all outbound connections to a static list of hosts (both In-app requests and WKWebView/Safari). App & both extensions have Network Extension entitlement with content-filter-provider and filter-control-provider What’s working: Safari and WKWebView requests matching the block list are dropped. What’s broken: In-app traffic never reaches the Data Provider—those requests always succeed. Setup: • NEFilterProviderConfiguration with both Data & Control providers, filterBrowsers = true, filterSockets = true • Data Provider implements handleNewFlow for socket/browser flows • Control Provider implements handleNewFlow for browser flows • Enabled via saveToPreferences() and toggled ON in Settings

Hi all! I’m having trouble distributing an iOS app with a DNS Proxy NetworkExtension via AdHoc. The app and extension work perfectly with development profiles, but when I export and install the AdHoc IPA, I get a “permission denied” error when trying to install/enable the DNS Proxy extension. What I’ve done: Both the app and the DNS Proxy extension have their own App IDs in the Apple Developer portal. Both App IDs have the same App Group enabled: group.com.irakai.SafeLinkApp2. The extension App ID has the NetworkExtension capability with dns-proxy enabled. I created two AdHoc provisioning profiles (one for the app, one for the extension), both including the same devices and the correct entitlements. I assigned the correct AdHoc profiles to each target in Xcode and exported the IPA via Organizer. I install the IPA on a registered device using Apple Configurator. Entitlements (extracted from the signed binaries on device): App: <key>application-identifier</key><string>6PBG234246.com.irakai.SafeLinkApp2</string> <key>com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension</key><array> <string>packet-tunnel-provider</string> <string>dns-proxy</string> </array> <key>com.apple.developer.team-identifier</key><string>6PBG234246</string> <key>com.apple.security.application-groups</key><array> <string>group.com.irakai.SafeLinkApp2</string> </array> <key>get-task-allow</key><false/> DNSProxy Extension: <key>application-identifier</key><string>6PBG234246.com.irakai.SafeLinkApp2.DNSProxy</string> <key>com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension</key><array> <string>dns-proxy</string> </array> <key>com.apple.developer.team-identifier</key><string>6PBG234246</string> <key>com.apple.security.application-groups</key><array> <string>group.com.irakai.SafeLinkApp2</string> </array> <key>get-task-allow</key><false/> Error message (from my app’s logs): Error instalando DNS Proxy: permission denied Usuario: Roberto AppGroup: group.com.irakai.SafeLinkApp2 AppGroupPath: /private/var/mobile/Containers/Shared/AppGroup/D8AD2DED-AD96-4915-9B7A-648C9504679B Entitlements: BundleId: com.irakai.SafeLinkApp2 Debug info: Error Domain=NEDNSProxyErrorDomain Code=1 "permission denied" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=permission denied} Other details: The device is included in both AdHoc profiles. The App Group is present and identical in both entitlements. The extension’s bundle identifier matches the App ID in the portal. The extension is signed with the correct AdHoc profile. I have tried rebooting the device and reinstalling the IPA. The error only occurs with AdHoc; development builds work fine. Questions: Is there anything else I should check regarding AdHoc provisioning for NetworkExtension DNS Proxy? Are there any known issues with AdHoc and NetworkExtension on recent iOS versions? Is there a way to get more detailed diagnostics from the system about why the permission is denied? Could this be a bug in iOS, or am I missing a subtle configuration step? Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Our application currently uses NEFilterPacketProvider to filter network traffic based on Layer 4 rules (5-tuple: source IP, destination IP, source port, destination port, and protocol) on a packet-by-packet basis. We now want to extend this filtering to also consider the associated process—for example, allowing traffic from a specific source IP to a destination IP and port only if it's associated with a specific local process. That is, we’d like to make filtering decisions not just based on the 5-tuple, but also on the identity of the process either sending or receiving the traffic. We’ve looked into NEFilterSocketProvider, which does expose Layer 7 information such as process identifiers. However, it doesn’t seem to be tightly synchronized with the packet flow handled by NEFilterPacketProvider. As a result, there’s a risk that we might only get process information after the TCP handshake is complete, or before the socket is fully bound—at which point some of the 5-tuple fields (such as the local port) may still be unavailable. What we need is a way to correlate the 5-tuple with the relevant process name (either sender or receiver) at the time the first packet—e.g., a SYN packet—is about to be sent or received. Is there a recommended way to achieve this kind of early, process-aware filtering using NetworkExtension APIs?

Question 1: After NetworkExtension is installed, when the software receives a pushed uninstall command, it needs to download the entire software but fails to uninstall this NetworkExtension. Are there any solutions? Question 2: How can residual, uninstalled NetworkExtensions be cleaned up when SIP (System Integrity Protection) is enabled?

1、已经检查过手机的存储空间，还有一百多G的空间。app端进行网络接口情况的时候报错了，报错信息如下： Error : Error Domain=NSPOSIXErrorDomain Code=28 "No space left on device" UserInfo={_NSURLErrorFailingURLSessionTaskErrorKey=LocalDataTask <7DB1CBFD-B9BE-422D-9C9A-78D8FC04DC1B>.<76>, _kCFStreamErrorDomainKey=1, _kCFStreamErrorCodeKey=28, _NSURLErrorRelatedURLSessionTaskErrorKey=( "LocalDataTask <7DB1CBFD-B9BE-422D-9C9A-78D8FC04DC1B>.<76>" ), _NSURLErrorNWPathKey=satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: pdp_ip0[lte], ipv4, ipv6, dns, expensive, estimated upload: 65536Bps, uses cell} 2、手机型号是iPhone 15 Plus，iOS 17.6.1