I'm looking for help with a network extension filtering issue. Specifically, we have a subclass of NEFilterDataProvider that is used to filter flows based upon a set of rules, including source IP and destination IP. We've run into an issue where the source IP is frequently 0.0.0.0 (or the IPv6 equivalent) on outgoing flows. This has made it so rules based upon source IP don't work. This is also an issue as we report these connections, but we're lacking critical data. We were able to work around the issue somewhat by keeping a list of flows that we allow that we periodically check to see if the source IP is available, and then report after it becomes available. We also considered doing a "peekBytes" to allow a bit of data to flow and then recheck the flow, but we don't want to allow data leakage on connections that should be blocked because of the source IP. Is there a way to force the operating system or network extension frameworks to determine the source IP for an outbound flow without allowing any bytes to flow to the network? STEPS TO REPRODUCE Create a network filtering extension for filtering flows using NEFilterDataProvider See that when handleNewFlow: is called, the outgoing flow lacks the source IP (is 0.0.0.0) in most cases There is this post that is discussing a similar question, though for a slightly different reason. I imagine the answer to this and the other post will be related, at least as far as NEFilterDataProvider:handleNewFlow not having source IP is considered. Thanks!

1、已经检查过手机的存储空间，还有一百多G的空间。app端进行网络接口情况的时候报错了，报错信息如下： Error : Error Domain=NSPOSIXErrorDomain Code=28 "No space left on device" UserInfo={_NSURLErrorFailingURLSessionTaskErrorKey=LocalDataTask <7DB1CBFD-B9BE-422D-9C9A-78D8FC04DC1B>.<76>, _kCFStreamErrorDomainKey=1, _kCFStreamErrorCodeKey=28, _NSURLErrorRelatedURLSessionTaskErrorKey=( "LocalDataTask <7DB1CBFD-B9BE-422D-9C9A-78D8FC04DC1B>.<76>" ), _NSURLErrorNWPathKey=satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: pdp_ip0[lte], ipv4, ipv6, dns, expensive, estimated upload: 65536Bps, uses cell} 2、手机型号是iPhone 15 Plus，iOS 17.6.1

I'm developing a Matter-over-thread generic switch with 2 generic switch endpoints. This is configured as an Intermittently Connected Device with Long Idle Time. I have an Apple TV serving as the thread border router. I'm able to commission the device successfully in the Home app and assign actions to each of the buttons however when the device is rebooted the subscription doesn't appear to resume successfully and the buttons no longer work. I've tested this on various SOC's with their respective SDKs including ESP32-C6, nrf52840 and EFR32MG24 and the behaviour was consistent across all of them. It was working originally when I first started out on the ESP32-C6, then the issue popped up first when I was testing the nrf52840. In that SDK I set persistent subscriptions explicitly and it seemed to resolve the issue until it popped up again when I found that unplugging and restarting the Apple TV completely which appeared to fix the issue with subscriptions not resuming. Recently I've added a Home Pod Mini Gen 2 to the matter fabric so there are now two TBR on the network and restarting both the Apple TV and the HomePod doesn't appear to resolve the issue anymore and the subscriptions are not resuming across all three SOC's on device reboot I'm wondering if there might be something preventing the subscriptions from resuming?

Hi there, We are facing some issues regarding TLS connectivity: Starting with iOS 26, the operating system refuses to open TLS sockets to local devices with self-signed certificates over Wi-Fi. In this situation, connection is no longer possible, even if the device is detected on the network with Bonjour. We have not found a workaround for this problem. We've tryied those solutions without success: Added the 'NSAppTransportSecurity' key to the info.plist file, testing all its items, such as "NSAllowsLocalNetworking", "NSExceptionDomains", etc. Various code changes to use properties such as "sec_protocol_options_set_local_identity" and "sec_protocol_options_set_tls_server_name" to no avail. Brutally import the certificate files into the project and load them via, for example, "Bundle.main.url(forResource: "nice_INTERFACE_server_cert", withExtension: "crt")", using methods such as sec_trust_copy_ref and SecCertificateCopyData. Download the .pem or .crt files to the iPhone, install them (now visible under "VPN & Device Management"), and then flag them as trusted by going to "Settings -> General -> Info -> Trust". certificates" The most critical part seems to be the line sec_protocol_options_set_verify_block(tlsOptions.securityProtocolOptions, { $2(true) }, queue) whose purpose is to bypass certificate checks and validate all of them (as apps already do). However, on iOS26, if I set a breakpoint on leg$2(true),` it never gets there, while on iOS 18, it does. I'll leave as example the part of the code that was tested the most below. Currently, on iOS26, the handler systematically falls back to .cancelled: func startConnection(host: String, port: UInt16) { self.queue = DispatchQueue(label: "socketQueue") let tlsOptions = NWProtocolTLS.Options() sec_protocol_options_set_verify_block(tlsOptions.securityProtocolOptions, { $2(true) }, queue) let parameters = NWParameters(tls: tlsOptions) self.nwConnection = NWConnection(host: .init(host), port: .init(rawValue: port)!, using: parameters) self.nwConnection.stateUpdateHandler = { [weak self] state in switch state { case .setup: break case .waiting(let error): self?.connectionDidFail(error: error) case .preparing: break case .ready: self?.didConnectSubject.onNext(Void()) case .failed(let error): self?.connectionDidFail(error: error) case .cancelled: self?.didDisconnectSubject.onNext(nil) @unknown default: break } } self.setupReceive() self.nwConnection.start(queue: queue) } These are the prints made during the procedure. The ones with the dot are from the app, while the ones without are warnings/info from Xcode: 🔵 INFO WifiNetworkManager.connect():52 - Try to connect onto the interface access point with ssid NiceProView4A9151_AP 🔵 INFO WifiNetworkManager.connect():68 - Connected to NiceProView4A9151_AP tcp_output [C13:2] flags=[R.] seq=215593821, ack=430284980, win=4096 state=CLOSED rcv_nxt=430284980, snd_una=215593821 nw_endpoint_flow_failed_with_error [C13 192.168.0.1:443 in_progress channel-flow (satisfied (Path is satisfied), viable, interface: en0[802.11], dns, uses wifi, LQM: unknown)] already failing, returning nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal_block_invoke [C13] Client called nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal on unconnected nw_connection nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal_block_invoke [C13] Client called nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal on unconnected nw_connection nw_connection_copy_connected_local_endpoint_block_invoke [C13] Client called nw_connection_copy_connected_local_endpoint on unconnected nw_connection nw_connection_copy_connected_remote_endpoint_block_invoke [C13] Client called nw_connection_copy_connected_remote_endpoint on unconnected nw_connection nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal_block_invoke [C14] Client called nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal on unconnected nw_connection nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal_block_invoke [C14] Client called nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal on unconnected nw_connection nw_connection_copy_connected_local_endpoint_block_invoke [C14] Client called nw_connection_copy_connected_local_endpoint on unconnected nw_connection nw_connection_copy_connected_remote_endpoint_block_invoke [C14] Client called nw_connection_copy_connected_remote_endpoint on unconnected nw_connection [C14 192.168.0.1:443 tcp, tls, attribution: developer] is already cancelled, ignoring cancel [C14 192.168.0.1:443 tcp, tls, attribution: developer] is already cancelled, ignoring cancel nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal_block_invoke [C15] Client called nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal on unconnected nw_connection nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal_block_invoke [C15] Client called nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal on unconnected nw_connection nw_connection_copy_connected_local_endpoint_block_invoke [C15] Client called nw_connection_copy_connected_local_endpoint on unconnected nw_connection nw_connection_copy_connected_remote_endpoint_block_invoke [C15] Client called nw_connection_copy_connected_remote_endpoint on unconnected nw_connection nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal_block_invoke [C16] Client called nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal on unconnected nw_connection nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal_block_invoke [C16] Client called nw_connection_copy_protocol_metadata_internal on unconnected nw_connection nw_connection_copy_connected_local_endpoint_block_invoke [C16] Client called nw_connection_copy_connected_local_endpoint on unconnected nw_connection nw_connection_copy_connected_remote_endpoint_block_invoke [C16] Client called nw_connection_copy_connected_remote_endpoint on unconnected nw_connection [C16 192.168.0.1:443 tcp, tls, attribution: developer] is already cancelled, ignoring cancel [C16 192.168.0.1:443 tcp, tls, attribution: developer] is already cancelled, ignoring cancel 🔴 ERROR InterfaceDisconnectedViewModel.connect():51 - Sequence timeout.

I’m developing a iOS VPN app, and I need to execute a task in the main app even when it’s in the background or killed state. I know the Network Extension continues running during those times. Is there a way for the extension to immediately notify the app or trigger a task on the app side?

Hi! I wrote an internal used backup command line tool which is in use since several years. Today I got an error while sending an email: “Failed: ioOnClosedChannel”. I assume that the latest macOS updates did break my app. On the server I use macOS 15.7 and on my development machine macOS 26. Here is the related code: private func sendMail() { var a : [Email.Attachment] = [] if self.imageData != nil { switch self.imageType { case .tiff: a.append(Email.Attachment(name: "Statistics.tif", contentType: #"image/tiff"#, contents: ByteBuffer(bytes: self.imageData!))) case .pdf: a.append(Email.Attachment(name: "Statistics.pdf", contentType: #"application/pdf"#, contents: ByteBuffer(bytes: self.imageData!))) case .unknown: fatalError("Unimplemented attachment type!") } } mailHtml = mailHtml.replacingOccurrences(of: "<br>", with: "<br>\n") let email = Email(sender: .init(name: "Backup", emailAddress: "SENDER@MYDOMAIN"), replyTo: nil, recipients: recipients, cc: [], bcc: [], subject: self.subject, body: .universal(plain: self.mailText, html: mailHtml), attachments: a) let evg = MultiThreadedEventLoopGroup(numberOfThreads: System.coreCount) let mailer = Mailer(group: evg, configuration: smtpConfig, transmissionLogger: nil) do { print("Sending mail... ", terminator: "") try mailer.send(email: email).wait() // <-- ERROR HERE Failed: ioOnClosedChannel print("done.") } catch { print("Failed: \(error)") } do { try evg.syncShutdownGracefully() } catch { print("Failed shutdown: \(error)") } } I use https://github.com/sersoft-gmbh/swift-smtp. Any clue about the reason of this error? TIA, GreatOm

Just bought a macbook pro m4, im trying to run an api on port 5000, disabled airplay receiver, checked processes, ghost ones, hidden ones, and stuck ones. I didn't find a thing using the port, but i still get port in use.

Hello everyone, I'm trying to figure out how to transmit a UIImage (png or tiff) securely to an application running in my desktop browser (Mac or PC). The desktop application and iOS app would potentially be running on the same local network (iOS hotspot or something) or have no internet connection at all. I'm trying to securely send over an image that the running desktop app could ingest. I was thinking something like a local server securely accepting image data from an iPhone. Any suggestions ideas or where to look for more info would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for your help.

Is Apple's Wi-Fi Aware certified by the Wi-Fi Alliance? Is there any non-compliance of Apple's Wi-Fi Aware with the Wi-Fi Alliance standards? Does Apple have a roadmap to switch AWDL to Wi-Fi Aware? Does Apple have plans to adopt Wi-Fi Aware in Mac computers?

I am running a full-tunnel VPN using a Packet Tunnel Provider. During VPN setup, we configure DNS setting with specific DNS servers for all domains to be used by the tunnel. However, our project requires DNS resolution for every domain from both the VPN-provided DNS servers and the ISP’s DNS servers. When I attempt to use c-ares or other third-party libraries to resolve domains via the ISP DNS servers, these libraries only detect and use the VPN DNS servers instead. As a result, all queries fail. Is there a way on iOS to programmatically determine the ISP DNS servers while a full-tunnel VPN is active, or a system API that allows DNS queries to be explicitly resolved using the ISP’s DNS servers?

I haven’t come across any official documentation regarding the limit on the number of Network Extensions macOS can run. However, I did see some discussions suggesting that Apple might restrict this to 5 extensions in macOS Tahoe. Is there any official confirmation on this?

Hi everyone, I'm currently experimenting with building a simple DNS filter using Apple's Packet Tunnel framework. Here's the flow I'm trying to implement: Create a TUN interface Set up a UDP socket Read packets via packetFlow.readPackets Parse the raw IP packet Forward the UDP payload through the socket Receive the response from the server Reconstruct the IP packet with the response Write it back to the TUN interface using packetFlow.writePackets Here’s an example of an intercepted IP packet (DNS request): 45 00 00 3c 15 c4 00 00 40 11 93 d1 c0 a8 00 64 08 08 08 08 ed 6e 00 35 00 28 e5 c9 7f da 01 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 74 69 6d 65 05 61 70 70 6c 65 03 63 6f 6d 00 00 01 00 01 And here’s the IP packet I tried writing back into the TUN interface (DNS response): 45 00 00 89 5e 37 40 00 40 11 0b 11 08 08 08 08 c0 a8 00 64 00 35 ed 6e 00 75 91 e8 7f da 81 80 00 01 00 04 00 00 00 00 04 74 69 6d 65 05 61 70 70 6c 65 03 63 6f 6d 00 00 01 00 01 c0 0c 00 05 00 01 00 00 0c fb 00 11 04 74 69 6d 65 01 67 07 61 61 70 6c 69 6d 67 c0 17 c0 2c 00 01 00 01 00 00 03 04 00 04 11 fd 74 fd c0 2c 00 01 00 01 00 00 03 04 00 04 11 fd 74 7d c0 2c 00 01 00 01 00 00 03 04 00 04 11 fd 54 fb Unfortunately, it seems the packet is not being written back correctly to the TUN interface. I'm not seeing any expected DNS response behavior on the device. Also, I noticed that after creating the TUN, the interface address shows up as 0.0.0.0:0 in Xcode. The system log includes this message when connecting the VPN: NWPath does not have valid interface: satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: utun20[endc_sub6], ipv4, dns, expensive, uses cellular Does anyone know how to properly initialize the TUN so that the system recognizes it with a valid IP configuration? Or why my written-back packet might be getting ignored? Any help would be appreciated!

I'm trying to use NEHotspotNetwork to configure an IoT. I've read all the issues that have plagued other developers when using this framework, and I was under the impression that bugs were filed and fixed. Here are my issues in hopes that someone can catch my bug, or has finally figured this out and it's not a bug in the framework with no immediate fix on the horizon. If I use the following code: let config = NEHotspotConfiguration(ssid: ssid) config.joinOnce = true KiniStatusBanner.shared.show(text: "Connecting to Kini", in: presentingVC.view) NEHotspotConfigurationManager.shared.apply(config) { error in DispatchQueue.main.async { if let nsError = error as NSError?, nsError.domain == NEHotspotConfigurationErrorDomain, nsError.code == NEHotspotConfigurationError.alreadyAssociated.rawValue { print("Already connected to \(self.ssid)") KiniStatusBanner.shared.dismiss() self.presentCaptivePortal(from: presentingVC, activationCode: activationCode) } else if let error = error { // This doesn't happen print("❌ Failed to connect: \(error.localizedDescription)") KiniStatusBanner.shared.update(text: "Failed to Connect to Kini. Try again later.") KiniStatusBanner.shared.dismiss(after: 2.5) } else { // !!!! Most often, this is the path the code takes NEHotspotNetwork.fetchCurrent { current in if let ssid = current?.ssid, ssid == self.ssid { log("✅✅ 1st attempt: connected to \(self.ssid)") KiniStatusBanner.shared.dismiss() self.presentCaptivePortal(from: presentingVC, activationCode: activationCode) } else { // Dev forums talked about giving things a bit of time to settle and then try again DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter(deadline: .now() + 2) { NEHotspotNetwork.fetchCurrent { current in if let ssid = current?.ssid, ssid == self.ssid { log("✅✅✅ 2nd attempt: connected to \(self.ssid)") KiniStatusBanner.shared.dismiss() self.presentCaptivePortal(from: presentingVC, activationCode: activationCode) } else { log("❌❌❌ 2nd attempt: Failed to connect: \(self.ssid)") KiniStatusBanner.shared.update(text: "Could not join Kini network. Try again.") KiniStatusBanner.shared.dismiss(after: 2.5) self.cleanupHotspot() DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter(deadline: .now() + 2) { print("cleanup again") self.cleanupHotspot() } } } } log("❌❌ 1st attempt: Failed to connect: \(self.ssid)") KiniStatusBanner.shared.update(text: "Could not join Kini network. Try again.") KiniStatusBanner.shared.dismiss(after: 2.5) self.cleanupHotspot() } As you can see, one can't just use NEHotspotConfigurationManager.shared.apply and has to double-check to make sure that it actually succeeds, by checking to see if the SSID desired, matches the one that the device is using. Ok, but about 50% of the time, the call to NEHotspotNetwork.fetchCurrent gives me this error: NEHotspotNetwork nehelper sent invalid result code [1] for Wi-Fi information request Well, there is a workaround for that randomness too. At some point before calling this code, one can: let locationManager = CLLocationManager() locationManager.requestWhenInUseAuthorization() That eliminates the NEHotspotNetwork nehelper sent invalid result code [1] for Wi-Fi information request BUT... three issues. The user is presented with an authorization alert: Allow "Kini" to use your location? This app needs access to you Wi-Fi name to connect to your Kini device. Along with a map with a location pin on it. This gives my users a completely wrong impression, especially for a device/app where we promise users not to track their location. They actually see a map with their location pinned on it, implying something that would freak out anyone who was expecting no tracking. I understand why an authorization is normally required, but since all we are getting is our own IoT's SSID, there should be no need for an authorization for this, and no map associated with the request. Again, they are accessing my IoT's network, NOT their home/location Wi-Fi SSID. My app already knows and specifies that network, and all I am trying to do is to work around a bug that makes it look like I have a successful return from NEHotspotConfigurationManager.shared.apply() when in fact the network I was looking for wasn't even on. Not only do I get instances where the network doesn't connect, and result codes show no errors, but I also get instances where I get an alert that says that the network is unreachable, yet my IoT shows that the app is connected to its Wi-Fi. On the iOS device, I go to the Wi-Fi settings, and see that I am on the IoT's network. So basically, sometimes I connect, but the frameworks says that there is no connection, and sometimes it reports a connection when there is none. As you can see in the code, I call cleanupHotspot() to make the iOS device get off of my temp Wi-Fi SSID. This is the code: func cleanupHotspot() { NEHotspotConfigurationManager.shared.removeConfiguration(forSSID: ssid) } That code gets called by the above code when things aren't as I expect and need to cleanup. And I also call it when the user dismisses the viewcontroller that is attempting to make the connection. It doesn't always work. I get stuck on the tempo SSID, unless I go through this whole thing again: try to make the connection again, this time it succeeds quickly, and then I can disconnect. Any ideas? I'm on iOS18.5, and have tried this on multiple iPhones including 11, 13 and 16.

On "Accessory Interface Specification CarPlay Addendum R10", it says that it is recommended that the accessory uses a MIMO (2x2) hardware configuration, does this imply that WiFi 5 and SISO (1X1) will be phased out in the near future? When will WiFi 6 MIMO (2x2) become mandatory? On "Accessory Interface Specification CarPlay Addendum R10", it says that Spatial Audio is mandatory. However, for aftermarket in-vehicle infotainment (IVI) system due to the number of speakers are less than 6, is it allowed not to support spatial audio for this type of aftermarket IVI system?

We’re looking to implement a custom IPSec IKEv2 VPN using the Packet Tunnel Provider network extension on iOS because we need to add extra information to EAP, which the built-in IKEv2 VPN configuration does not support. Is it possible to handle the full IKEv2 negotiation and IPSec tunneling within the Packet Tunnel Provider extension? Or are there limitations that would prevent implementing a full IKEv2 stack this way? Any insights or alternative approaches would be appreciated. Thanks!

I'm using NERelayManager to set Relay configuration which all works perfectly fine. I then do a curl with the included domain and while I see QUIC connection succeeds with relay server and H3 request goes to the server, the connection gets abruptly closed by the client with "Software caused connection abort". Console has this information: default 09:43:04.459517-0700 curl nw_flow_connected [C1.1.1 192.168.4.197:4433 in_progress socket-flow (satisfied (Path is satisfied), viable, interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, ipv6, dns, uses wifi)] Transport protocol connected (quic) default 09:43:04.459901-0700 curl [C1.1.1 192.168.4.197:4433 in_progress socket-flow (satisfied (Path is satisfied), viable, interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, ipv6, dns, uses wifi)] event: flow:finish_transport @0.131s default 09:43:04.460745-0700 curl nw_flow_connected [C1.1.1 192.168.4.197:4433 in_progress socket-flow (satisfied (Path is satisfied), viable, interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, ipv6, dns, uses wifi)] Joined protocol connected (http3) default 09:43:04.461049-0700 curl [C1.1.1 192.168.4.197:4433 in_progress socket-flow (satisfied (Path is satisfied), viable, interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, ipv6, dns, uses wifi)] event: flow:finish_transport @0.133s default 09:43:04.465115-0700 curl [C2 E47A3A0C-7275-4F6B-AEDF-59077ABAE34B 192.168.4.197:4433 quic, multipath service: 1, tls, definite, attribution: developer] cancel default 09:43:04.465238-0700 curl [C2 E47A3A0C-7275-4F6B-AEDF-59077ABAE34B 192.168.4.197:4433 quic, multipath service: 1, tls, definite, attribution: developer] cancelled [C2 FCB1CFD1-4BF9-4E37-810E-81265D141087 192.168.4.139:53898<->192.168.4.197:4433] Connected Path: satisfied (Path is satisfied), viable, interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, ipv6, dns, uses wifi Duration: 0.121s, QUIC @0.000s took 0.000s, TLS 1.3 took 0.111s bytes in/out: 2880/4322, packets in/out: 4/8, rtt: 0.074s, retransmitted bytes: 0, out-of-order bytes: 0 ecn packets sent/acked/marked/lost: 3/1/0/0 default 09:43:04.465975-0700 curl nw_flow_disconnected [C2 192.168.4.197:4433 cancelled multipath-socket-flow ((null))] Output protocol disconnected default 09:43:04.469189-0700 curl nw_endpoint_proxy_receive_report [C1.1 IPv4#124bdc4d:80 in_progress proxy (satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, ipv6, dns, proxy, uses wifi)] Privacy proxy failed with error 53 ([C1.1.1] masque Proxy: http://192.168.4.197:4433) default 09:43:04.469289-0700 curl [C1.1.1 192.168.4.197:4433 failed socket-flow (satisfied (Path is satisfied), viable, interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, ipv6, dns, uses wifi)] event: flow:failed_connect @0.141s, error Software caused connection abort Relay server otherwise works fine with our QUIC MASQUE clients but not with built-in macOS MASQUE client. Anything I'm missing?

I had noticed that my slaac address changed between one beta and the other, but wasn't sure. Now with the RC 15.4 RC (24E247) I made point of preserving the info before updating from the previous beta. What I noticed is that not only the slaac address changes, but also the my ether address, even though I have it on Fixed in the settings. Is it expected that the ether, and the slaac, not be rotated after a OS update?

General: Forums subtopic: App & System Services > Networking DevForums tag: Network Extension Network Extension framework documentation Routing your VPN network traffic article Filtering traffic by URL sample code Filtering Network Traffic sample code TN3120 Expected use cases for Network Extension packet tunnel providers technote TN3134 Network Extension provider deployment technote TN3165 Packet Filter is not API technote Network Extension and VPN Glossary forums post Debugging a Network Extension Provider forums post Exporting a Developer ID Network Extension forums post Network Extension Framework Entitlements forums post Network Extension vs ad hoc techniques on macOS forums post Network Extension Provider Packaging forums post NWEndpoint History and Advice forums post Extra-ordinary Networking forums post Wi-Fi management: Wi-Fi Fundamentals forums post TN3111 iOS Wi-Fi API overview technote How to modernize your captive network developer news post iOS Network Signal Strength forums post See also Networking Resources. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com"

Are the network relays introduced in 2023 and https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2023/10002/ the same thing as the Private Relay introduced in 2021? https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2021/10096/ We are considering verifying the relay function, but we are not sure whether they are the same function or different functions. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicemanagement/relay?language=objc

Hi, I observed some unexpected behavior and hope that someone can enlighten me as to what this is about: mDNSResponder prepends IP / network based default search domains that are checked before any other search domain. E.g. 0.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. would be used for an interface with an address in the the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet. This is done for any configured non-link-local IP address. I tried to find any mention of an approach like this in RFCs but couldn't spot anything. Please note that this is indeed a search domain and different from reverse-DNS lookups. Example output of tcpdump for ping devtest: 10:02:13.850802 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 43461, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 92) 192.168.1.2.52319 &gt; 192.168.1.1.53: 54890+ [1au] A? devtest.0.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. (64) I was able to identify the code that adds those default IP subnet based search domains but failed to spot any indication as to what this is about: https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/mDNSResponder/blob/d5029b5/mDNSMacOSX/mDNSMacOSX.c#L4171-L4211 Does anyone here have an ideas as to what this might be about?