The app “Wi-Fi Aware Sample” on Bojie的iPhone quit unexpectedly. Domain: IDEDebugSessionErrorDomain Code: 20 Failure Reason: Message from debugger: The LLDB RPC server has crashed. You may need to manually terminate your process. The crash log is located in ~/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports and has a prefix 'lldb-rpc-server'. Please file a bug and attach the most recent crash log. User Info: { DVTErrorCreationDateKey = "2025-09-17 10:26:56 +0000"; IDEDebugSessionErrorUserInfoUnavailabilityError = "Error Domain=com.apple.dt.deviceprep Code=-10 "Fetching debug symbols for Bojie\U7684iPhone" UserInfo={NSLocalizedRecoverySuggestion=Xcode will continue when the operation completes., NSLocalizedDescription=Fetching debug symbols for Bojie\U7684iPhone}"; IDERunOperationFailingWorker = DBGLLDBLauncher; } Event Metadata: com.apple.dt.IDERunOperationWorkerFinished : { "device_identifier" = "00008101-001E29E01E63003A"; "device_isCoreDevice" = 1; "device_model" = "iPhone13,3"; "device_osBuild" = "26.0 (23A341)"; "device_osBuild_monotonic" = 2300034100; "device_os_variant" = 1; "device_platform" = "com.apple.platform.iphoneos"; "device_platform_family" = 2; "device_reality" = 1; "device_thinningType" = "iPhone13,3"; "device_transport" = 1; "dvt_coredevice_version" = "477.23"; "dvt_coredevice_version_monotonic" = 477023000000000; "dvt_coresimulator_version" = 1043; "dvt_coresimulator_version_monotonic" = 1043000000000000; "dvt_mobiledevice_version" = "1818.0.1"; "dvt_mobiledevice_version_monotonic" = 1818000001000000; "launchSession_schemeCommand" = Run; "launchSession_schemeCommand_enum" = 1; "launchSession_targetArch" = arm64; "launchSession_targetArch_enum" = 6; "operation_duration_ms" = 1922640; "operation_errorCode" = 20; "operation_errorDomain" = IDEDebugSessionErrorDomain; "operation_errorWorker" = DBGLLDBLauncher; "operation_error_reportable" = 1; "operation_name" = IDERunOperationWorkerGroup; "operation_unavailabilityErrorCode" = "-10"; "operation_unavailabilityErrorDomain" = "com.apple.dt.deviceprep"; "param_consoleMode" = 1; "param_debugger_attachToExtensions" = 0; "param_debugger_attachToXPC" = 1; "param_debugger_type" = 3; "param_destination_isProxy" = 0; "param_destination_platform" = "com.apple.platform.iphoneos"; "param_diag_MainThreadChecker_stopOnIssue" = 0; "param_diag_MallocStackLogging_enableDuringAttach" = 0; "param_diag_MallocStackLogging_enableForXPC" = 1; "param_diag_allowLocationSimulation" = 1; "param_diag_checker_mtc_enable" = 1; "param_diag_checker_tpc_enable" = 1; "param_diag_gpu_frameCapture_enable" = 0; "param_diag_gpu_shaderValidation_enable" = 0; "param_diag_gpu_validation_enable" = 0; "param_diag_guardMalloc_enable" = 0; "param_diag_memoryGraphOnResourceException" = 0; "param_diag_queueDebugging_enable" = 1; "param_diag_runtimeProfile_generate" = 0; "param_diag_sanitizer_asan_enable" = 0; "param_diag_sanitizer_tsan_enable" = 0; "param_diag_sanitizer_tsan_stopOnIssue" = 0; "param_diag_sanitizer_ubsan_enable" = 0; "param_diag_sanitizer_ubsan_stopOnIssue" = 0; "param_diag_showNonLocalizedStrings" = 0; "param_diag_viewDebugging_enabled" = 1; "param_diag_viewDebugging_insertDylibOnLaunch" = 1; "param_install_style" = 2; "param_launcher_UID" = 2; "param_launcher_allowDeviceSensorReplayData" = 0; "param_launcher_kind" = 0; "param_launcher_style" = 99; "param_launcher_substyle" = 0; "param_lldbVersion_component_idx_1" = 0; "param_lldbVersion_monotonic" = 170300230950; "param_runnable_appExtensionHostRunMode" = 0; "param_runnable_productType" = "com.apple.product-type.application"; "param_testing_launchedForTesting" = 0; "param_testing_suppressSimulatorApp" = 0; "param_testing_usingCLI" = 0; "sdk_canonicalName" = "iphoneos26.0"; "sdk_osVersion" = "26.0"; "sdk_platformID" = 2; "sdk_variant" = iphoneos; "sdk_version_monotonic" = 2300527605; } System Information macOS Version 15.5 (Build 24F74) Xcode 26.0 (24141.31) (Build 17A5241o) Timestamp: 2025-09-17T18:26:56+08:00

In order to create a Message Filter Extension it is necessary to set up Shared Web Credentials. I'd like to form an understanding of what role SWC plays when the OS is making request to the associated network service (when the extension has called deferQueryRequestToNetwork()) and how this differs from when an app directly uses Shared Web Credentials itself. When an app is making direct use of SWC, it makes a request to obtain the user's credentials from the web site. However in the case of a Message Filter Extension, there aren't any individual user credentials, so what is happening behind the scenes when the OS makes a server request on behalf of a Message Filtering Extension? A more general question - the documentation for Shared Web Credentials says "Associated domains establish a secure association between domains and your app.". Thank you

The Wi‑Fi Alliance’s Wi‑Fi Aware data communication uses IPv6. However, in Chapter 53 “Wi‑Fi Aware” of the Accessory Design Guidelines for Apple Devices, Release R26, it is stated that “The Neighbor Discovery Protocol (NDP) for IPv6 address resolution is not supported.” This has caused confusion among developers: Does Apple’s Wi‑Fi Aware data communication actually use IPv6? What is the impact of “The Neighbor Discovery Protocol (NDP) for IPv6 address resolution is not supported” in Apple’s implementation?

I have been polishing an app that connects and communicates between a tvOS app I created and a iPadOS app that I also created. Connection works fantastic! However, for some reason when the user selects the button to open the DevicePicker provided by this API and then selects a iPad device the notification that comes across the the iPad reads, "Connect your Apple TV to "AppName" on this iPhone. Is this a bug or am I missing some configuration in maybe Info.plist or a modifier I need to add the DevicePicker for it to communicate the proper device identification? I have everything setup in both app Info.plist files to connect and work fine, but the notification saying iPhone on an iPad is sadly a small detail I would love to change. So...not sure if I found a bug or if I am missing something.

Hi everyone, I'm building a health-focused iOS and watchOS app that uses WatchConnectivity to sync real-time heart rate and core body temperature data from iPhone to Apple Watch. While the HealthKit integration works correctly on the iPhone side, I'm facing persistent issues with WatchConnectivity — the data either doesn't arrive on the Watch, or session(_:didReceiveMessage:) never gets triggered. Here's the setup: On iPhone: Using WCSession.default.sendMessage(_:replyHandler:errorHandler:) to send real-time values every few seconds. On Apple Watch: Implemented WCSessionDelegate, and session(_:didReceiveMessage:) is supposed to update the UI. Both apps have WCSession.isSupported() checks, activate the session, and assign delegates correctly. The session state shows isPaired = true and isWatchAppInstalled = true. Bluetooth and Wi-Fi are on, both devices are unlocked and nearby. Despite all this, the Watch never receives messages in real-time. Sometimes, data comes through in bulk much later or not at all. I've double-checked Info.plist configurations and made sure background modes include "Uses Bluetooth LE accessories" and "Background fetch" where appropriate. I would really appreciate guidance on: Best practices for reliable, low-latency message delivery with WatchConnectivity. Debugging steps or sample code to validate message transmission and reception. Any pitfalls related to UI updates from the delegate method. Happy to share further details. Thanks in advance!

Hi Team, I have a Network Extension application and UI frontend for it. The UI frontend talks to the Network Extension using XPC, as provided by NEMachServiceName. On M2 machine, The application and XPC connection works fine on clean installation. But, when the application is upgraded, the XPC connection keeps failing. Upgrade steps: PreInstall script kills the running processes, both UI and Network Extension Let installation continue PostInstall script to launch the application after installation complete. Following code is successful to the point of resume from UI application NSXPCInterface *exportedInterface = [NSXPCInterface interfaceWithProtocol:@protocol(IPCUIObject)]; newConnection.exportedInterface = exportedInterface; newConnection.exportedObject = delegate; NSXPCInterface *remoteObjectInterface = [NSXPCInterface interfaceWithProtocol:@protocol(IPCExtObject)]; newConnection.remoteObjectInterface = remoteObjectInterface; self.currentConnection = newConnection; [newConnection resume]; But it fails to get the object id<IPCExtObject> providerProxy = [self.currentConnection remoteObjectProxyWithErrorHandler:^(NSError *registerError) { }]; Please note, this only fails for M2. For M1, this exact code is running fine. Additionally, if I uninstall the application by dropping it in Trash and then installing the newer version, then too, the application works fine.

I’m developing an app designed for hospital environments, where public internet access may not be available. The app includes two components: the main app and a Local Connectivity Extension. Both rely on persistent TCP socket connections to communicate with a local server. We’re observing a recurring issue where the extension’s socket becomes unresponsive every 1–3 hours, but only when the device is on the lock screen, even if the main app remains in the foreground. When the screen is not locked, the connection is stable and no disconnections occur. ❗ Issue Details: • What’s going on: The extension sends a keep-alive ping packet every second, and the server replies with a pong and a system time packet. • The bug: The server stops receiving keep alive packets from the extension.  • On the server, we detect about 30 second gap on the server, a gap that shows no packets were received by the extension. This was confirmed via server logs and Wireshark).  • On the extension, from our logs there was no gap in sending packets. From it’s perspective, all packets were sent with no error.  • Because no packet are being received by the server, no packets will be sent to the extension. Eventually the server closes the connection due to keep-alive timeout.  • FYI we log when the NEAppPushProvider subclass sleeps and it did NOT go to sleep while we were debugging. 🧾 Example Logs: Extension log: 2025-03-24 18:34:48.808 sendKeepAliveRequest() 2025-03-24 18:34:49.717 sendKeepAliveRequest() 2025-03-24 18:34:50.692 sendKeepAliveRequest() ... // continuous sending of the ping packet to the server, no problems here 2025-03-24 18:35:55.063 sendKeepAliveRequest() 2025-03-24 18:35:55.063 keepAliveTimer IS TIME OUT... in CoreService. // this is triggered because we did not receive any packets from the server 2025-03-24 18:34:16.298 No keep-alive received for 16 seconds... connection ID=95b3... // this shows that there has been no packets being received by the extension ... 2025-03-24 18:34:30.298 Connection timed out on keep-alive. connection ID=95b3... // eventually closes due to no packets being received 2025-03-24 18:34:30.298 Remote Subsystem Disconnected {name=iPhone|Replica-Ext|...} ✅ Observations: • The extension process continues running and logging keep-alive attempts. • However, network traffic stops reaching the server, and no inbound packets are received by the extension. • It looks like the socket becomes silently suspended or frozen, without being properly closed or throwing an error. ❓Questions: • Do you know why this might happen within a Local Connectivity Extension, especially under foreground conditions and locked ? • Is there any known system behavior that might cause the socket to be suspended or blocked in this way after running for a few hours? Any insights or recommendations would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

IMPORTANT The resume rate limiter is now covered by the official documentation. See Use background sessions efficiently within Downloading files in the background. So, the following is here purely for historical perspective. NSURLSession’s background session support on iOS includes a resume rate limiter. This limiter exists to prevent apps from abusing the background session support in order to run continuously in the background. It works as follows: nsurlsessiond (the daemon that does all the background session work) maintains a delay value for your app. It doubles that delay every time it resumes (or relaunches) your app. It resets that delay to 0 when the user brings your app to the front. It also resets the delay to 0 if the delay period elapses without it having resumed your app. When your app creates a new task while it is in the background, the task does not start until that delay has expired. To understand the impact of this, consider what happens when you download 10 resources. If you pass them to the background session all at once, you see something like this: Your app creates tasks 1 through 10 in the background session. nsurlsessiond starts working on the first few tasks. As tasks complete, nsurlsessiond starts working on subsequent ones. Eventually all the tasks complete and nsurlsessiond resumes your app. Now consider what happens if you only schedule one task at a time: Your app creates task 1. nsurlsessiond starts working on it. When it completes, nsurlsessiond resumes your app. Your app creates task 2. nsurlsessiond delays the start of task 2 a little bit. nsurlsessiond starts working on task 2. When it completes, nsurlsessiond resumes your app. Your app creates task 3. nsurlsessiond delays the start of task 3 by double the previous amount. nsurlsessiond starts working on task 3. When it completes, nsurlsessiond resumes your app. Steps 8 through 11 repeat, and each time the delay doubles. Eventually the delay gets so large that it looks like your app has stopped making progress. If you have a lot of tasks to run then you can mitigate this problem by starting tasks in batches. That is, rather than start just one task in step 1, you would start 100. This only helps up to a point. If you have thousands of tasks to run, you will eventually start seeing serious delays. In that case it’s much better to change your design to use fewer, larger transfers. Note All of the above applies to iOS 8 and later. Things worked differently in iOS 7. There’s a post on DevForums that explains the older approach. Finally, keep in mind that there may be other reasons for your task not starting. Specifically, if the task is flagged as discretionary (because you set the discretionary flag when creating the task’s session or because the task was started while your app was in the background), the task may be delayed for other reasons (low power, lack of Wi-Fi, and so on). Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com" (r. 22323366)

I'm a long-time developer, but pretty new to Swift. I'm trying to get information from a web service (and found code online that I adjusted to build the function below). (Note: AAA_Result -- referenced towards the end -- is another class in my project) Trouble is, I'm getting the subject error on the call to session.dataTask. Any help/suggestions/doc pointers will be greatly appreciated!!! var result: Bool = false var cancellable: AnyCancellable? self.name = name let params = "json={\"\"}}" // removed json details let base_url = URL(string: "https://aaa.yyy.com?params=\(params)&format=json")! // removed URL specifics do { let task = URLSession.shared.dataTask(with: base_url) { data, response, error in if let error = error { print("Error: \(error)") } guard let response = response as? HTTPURLResponse, (200...299).contains(response.statusCode) else { print("Error \(String(describing: response))") } do { let decoder = JSONDecoder() let ar = try decoder.decode(AAA_Result.self, from: response.value) // removed specific details... result = true } catch { print(error) } } task.resume() } catch { print(error) } return result }

How often do we see control filter start and stop? I read somewhere that data filter is long lived and control Filter is short lived. When does the operating system kills the control filter process?

ios構成プロファイルの制限のallowCloudPrivateRelayのプライベートリレーの制御とRelayペイロードの機能は関係がありますか？ それとも別々の機能でしょうか？ ↓ s there a relationship between the private relay control in the iOS configuration profile restriction allowCloudPrivateRelay and the functionality of the Relay payload? Or are they separate features?

Every now and again folks notice that Network framework seems to create an unexpected number of connections on the wire. This post explains why that happens and what you should do about it. If you have questions or comments, put them in a new thread here on the forums. Use the App & System Services > Networking topic area and the Network tag. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com" Understanding Also-Ran Connections Network framework implements the Happy Eyeballs algorithm. That might create more on-the-wire connections than you expect. There are two common places where folks notice this: When looking at a packet trace When implementing a listener Imagine that you’ve implemented a TCP server using NWListener and you connect to it from a client using NWConnection. In many situations there are multiple network paths between the client and the server. For example, on a local network there’s always at least two paths: the link-local IPv6 path and either an infrastructure IPv4 path or the link-local IPv4 path. When you start your NWConnection, Network framework’s Happy Eyeballs algorithm might [1] start a TCP connection for each of these paths. It then races those connections. The one that connects first is the ‘winner’, and Network framework uses that connection for your traffic. Once it has a winner, the other connections, the also-ran connections, are redundant, and Network framework just closes them. You can observe this behaviour on the client side by looking in the system log. Many Network framework log entries (subsystem com.apple.network) contain a connection identifier. For example C8 is the eighth connection started by this process. Each connection may have child connections (C8.1, C8.2, …) and grandchild connections (C8.1.1, C8.1.2, …), and so on. You’ll see state transitions for these child connections occurring in parallel. For example, the following log entries show that C8 is racing the connection of two grandchild connections, C8.1.1 and C8.1.2: type: debug time: 12:22:26.825331+0100 process: TestAlsoRanConnections subsystem: com.apple.network category: connection message: nw_socket_connect [C8.1.1:1] Calling connectx(…) type: debug time: 12:22:26.964150+0100 process: TestAlsoRanConnections subsystem: com.apple.network category: connection message: nw_socket_connect [C8.1.2:1] Calling connectx(…) Note For more information about accessing the system log, see Your Friend the System Log. You also see this on the server side, but in this case each connection is visible to your code. When you connect from the client, Network framework calls your listener’s new connection handler with multiple connections. One of those is the winning connection and you’ll receive traffic on it. The others are the also-ran connections, and they close promptly. IMPORTANT Depending on network conditions there may be no also-ran connections. Or there may be lots of them. If you want to test the also-ran connection case, use Network Link Conditioner to add a bunch of delay to your packets. You don’t need to write special code to handle also-ran connections. From the perspective of your listener, these are simply connections that open and then immediately close. There’s no difference between an also-ran connection and, say, a connection from a client that immediately crashes. Or a connection generated by someone doing a port scan. Your server must be resilient to such things. However, the presence of these also-ran connections can be confusing, especially if you’re just getting started with Network framework, and hence this post. [1] This is “might” because the exact behaviour depends on network conditions. More on that below.

Questions about FTP crop up from time-to-time here on DevForums. In most cases I write a general “don’t use FTP” response, but I don’t have time to go into all the details. I’ve created this post as a place to collect all of those details, so I can reference them in other threads. IMPORTANT Apple’s official position on FTP is: All our FTP APIs have been deprecated, and you should avoid using deprecated APIs. Apple has been slowly removing FTP support from the user-facing parts of our system. The most recent example of this is that we removed the ftp command-line tool in macOS 10.13. You should avoid the FTP protocol and look to adopt more modern alternatives. The rest of this post is an informational explanation of the overall FTP picture. This post is locked so I can keep it focused. If you have questions or comments, please do create a new thread in the App & System Services > Networking subtopic and I’ll respond there. Don’t Use FTP FTP is a very old and very crufty protocol. Certain things that seem obvious to us now — like being able to create a GUI client that reliably shows a directory listing in a platform-independent manner — aren’t possible to do in FTP. However, by far the biggest problem with FTP is that it provides no security [1]. Specifically, the FTP protocol: Provides no on-the-wire privacy, so anyone can see the data you transfer Provides no client-authenticates-server authentication, so you have no idea whether you’re talking to the right server Provides no data integrity, allowing an attacker to munge your data in transit Transfers user names and passwords in the clear Using FTP for anonymous downloads may be acceptable (see the explanation below) but most other uses of FTP are completely inappropriate for the modern Internet. IMPORTANT You should only use FTP for anonymous downloads if you have an independent way to check the integrity of the data you’ve downloaded. For example, if you’re downloading a software update, you could use code signing to check its integrity. If you don’t check the integrity of the data you’ve downloaded, an attacker could substitute a malicious download instead. This would be especially bad in, say, the software update case. These fundamental problems with the FTP protocol mean that it’s not a priority for Apple. This is reflected in the available APIs, which is the subject of the next section. FTP APIs Apple provides two FTP APIs: All Apple platforms provide FTP downloads via URLSession. Most Apple platforms (everything except watchOS) support CFFTPStream, which allows for directory listings, downloads, uploads, and directory creation. All of these FTP APIs are now deprecated: URLSession was deprecated for the purposes of FTP in the 2022 SDKs (macOS 13, iOS 16, iPadOS 16, tvOS 16, watchOS 9) [2]. CFFTPStream was deprecated in the 2016 SDKs (macOS 10.11, iOS 9, iPadOS 9, tvOS 9). CFFTPStream still works about as well as it ever did, which is not particularly well. Specifically: There is at least one known crashing bug (r. 35745763), albeit one that occurs quite infrequently. There are clear implementation limitations — like the fact that CFFTPCreateParsedResourceListing assumes a MacRoman text encoding (r. 7420589) — that won’t be fixed. If you’re looking for an example of how to use these APIs, check out SimpleFTPSample. Note This sample hasn’t been updated since 2013 and is unlikely to ever be updated given Apple’s position on FTP. The FTP support in URLSession has significant limitations: It only supports FTP downloads; there’s no support for uploads or any other FTP operations. It doesn’t support resumable FTP downloads [3]. It doesn’t work in background sessions. That prevents it from running FTP downloads in the background on iOS. It’s only supported in classic loading mode. See the usesClassicLoadingMode property and the doc comments in <Foundation/NSURLSession.h>. If Apple’s FTP APIs are insufficient for your needs, you’ll need to write or acquire your own FTP library. Before you do that, however, consider switching to an alternative protocol. After all, if you’re going to go to the trouble of importing a large FTP library into your code base, you might as well import a library for a better protocol. The next section discusses some options in this space. Alternative Protocols There are numerous better alternatives to FTP: HTTPS is by far the best alternative to FTP, offering good security, good APIs on Apple platforms, good server support, and good network compatibility. Implementing traditional FTP operations over HTTPS can be a bit tricky. One possible way forward is to enable DAV extensions on the server. FTPS is FTP over TLS (aka SSL). While FTPS adds security to the protocol, which is very important, it still inherits many of FTP’s other problems. Personally I try to avoid this protocol. SFTP is a file transfer protocol that’s completely unrelated to FTP. It runs over SSH, making it a great alternative in many of the ad hoc setups that traditionally use FTP. Apple doesn’t have an API for either FTPS or SFTP, although on macOS you may be able to make some headway by invoking the sftp command-line tool. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com" [1] In another thread someone asked me about FTP’s other problems, those not related to security, so let’s talk about that. One of FTP’s implicit design goals was to provide cross-platform support that exposes the target platform. You can think of FTP as being kinda like telnet. When you telnet from Unix to VMS, it doesn’t aim to abstract away VMS commands, so that you can type Unix commands at the VMS prompt. Rather, you’re expected to run VMS commands. FTP is (a bit) like that. This choice made sense back when the FTP protocol was invented. Folks were expecting to use FTP via a command-line client, so there was a human in the loop. If they ran a command and it produced VMS-like output, that was fine because they knew that they were FTPing into a VMS machine. However, most users today are using GUI clients, and this design choice makes it very hard to create a general GUI client for FTP. Let’s consider the simple problem of getting the contents of a directory. When you send an FTP LIST command, the server would historically run the platform native directory list command and pipe the results back to you. To create a GUI client you have to parse that data to extract the file names. Doing that is a serious challenge. Indeed, just the first step, working out the text encoding, is a challenge. Many FTP servers use UTF-8, but some use ISO-Latin-1, some use other standard encodings, some use Windows code pages, and so on. I say “historically” above because there have been various efforts to standardise this stuff, both in the RFCs and in individual server implementations. However, if you’re building a general client you can’t rely on these efforts. After all, the reason why folks continue to use FTP is because of it widespread support. [2] To quote the macOS 13 Ventura Release Notes: FTP is deprecated for URLSession and related APIs. Please adopt modern secure networking protocols such as HTTPS. (92623659) [3] Although you can implement resumable downloads using the lower-level CFFTPStream API, courtesy of the kCFStreamPropertyFTPFileTransferOffset property. Revision History 2025-10-06 Explained that URLSession only supports FTP in classic loading mode. Made other minor editorial changes. 2024-04-15 Added a footnote about FTP’s other problems. Made other minor editorial changes. 2022-08-09 Noted that the FTP support in URLSession is now deprecated. Made other minor editorial changes. 2021-04-06 Fixed the formatting. Fixed some links. 2018-02-23 First posted.

Hi there, We have been trying to set up URL filtering for our app but have run into a wall with generating the bloom filter. Firstly, some context about our set up: OHTTP handlers Uses pre-warmed lambdas to expose the gateway and the configs endpoints using the javascript libary referenced here - https://developers.cloudflare.com/privacy-gateway/get-started/#resources Status = untested We have not yet got access to Apples relay servers PIR service We run the PIR service through AWS ECS behind an ALB The container clones the following repo https://github.com/apple/swift-homomorphic-encryption, outside of config changes, we do not have any custom functionality Status = working From the logs, everything seems to be working here because it is responding to queries when they are sent, and never blocking anything it shouldn’t Bloom filter generation We generate a bloom filter from the following url list: https://example.com http://example.com example.com Then we put the result into the url filtering example application from here - https://developer.apple.com/documentation/networkextension/filtering-traffic-by-url The info generated from the above URLs is: { "bits": 44, "hashes": 11, "seed": 2538058380, "content": "m+yLyZ4O" } Status = broken We think this is broken because we are getting requests to our PIR server for every single website we visit We would have expected to only receive requests to the PIR server when going to example.com because it’s in our block list It’s possible that behind the scenes Apple runs sporadically makes requests regardless of the bloom filter result, but that isn’t what we’d expect We are generating our bloom filter in the following way: We double hash the URL using fnv1a for the first, and murmurhash3 for the second hashTwice(value: any, seed?: any): any { return { first: Number(fnv1a(value, { size: 32 })), second: murmurhash3(value, seed), }; } We calculate the index positions from the following function/formula , as seen in https://github.com/ameshkov/swift-bloom/blob/master/Sources/BloomFilter/BloomFilter.swift#L96 doubleHashing(n: number, hashA: number, hashB: number, size: number): number { return Math.abs((hashA + n * hashB) % size); } Questions: What hashing algorithms are used and can you link an implementation that you know is compatible with Apple’s? How are the index positions calculated from the iteration number, the size, and the hash results? There was mention of a tool for generating a bloom filter that could be used for Apple’s URL filtering implementation, when can we expect the release of this tool?

Hi there, can some one help how to debug this crashes? where I can start to find root causes of this crashes. I've got lot of these NSInvalidArgumentException crashes in myapp last version I have no idea how to reproduce these issues since it doesn't point to any specific code on myapp, so I don't know how to start Fatal Exception: NSInvalidArgumentException -[NWConcrete_nw_protocol_options copyWithZone:]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x283391d60 Fatal Exception: NSInvalidArgumentException -[NSConcreteHashTable lengthOfBytesUsingEncoding:]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x281d4cbe0 Fatal Exception: NSInvalidArgumentException -[_NSXPCConnectionExportedObjectTable lengthOfBytesUsingEncoding:]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x2829d11d0 Fatal Exception: NSInvalidArgumentException -[OS_dispatch_group lengthOfBytesUsingEncoding:]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x281a11900 Fatal Exception: NSInvalidArgumentException -[__NSCFData getBytes:maxLength:usedLength:encoding:options:range:remainingRange:]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x28210e440 Fatal Exception: NSInvalidArgumentException -[_NSCoreTypesetterLayoutCache copyWithZone:]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x283bbc730 Thanks com.kitabisa.ios_issue_dd3c71c96cddb5bb99874640746439d6_crash_session_de9bb41c2b7e43fa9ccfc42e0f649aa3_DNE_0_v2_stacktrace.txt

Starting in iOS 26.4, PushKit has introduced a new "didReceiveIncomingVoIPPushWithPayload" delegate, making it explicit whether or not an app is required to report a call for any given push. The new delegate passes in a PKVoIPPushMetadata object which includes a "mustReport" property. We have not documented the exact criteria that will cause a mustReport to return false, but those criteria currently include: The app being in the foreground at the point the push is received. The app being on an active call at the point the push is received. The system determines that delivery delays have made the call old enough that it may no longer be viable. When mustReport is false, apps should call the PushKit completion handler (as they previously have) but are otherwise not required to take any other action. __ Kevin Elliott DTS Engineer, CoreOS/Hardware

Greetings, According to Apple's Wi-Fi Aware documentation (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/wifiaware) the Wi-Fi Aware APIs can be used only with peer devices that have been paired. Pairing can be performed using AccessorySetupKit or DeviceDiscoveryUI. Unfortunately, the sample code for Wi-Fi Aware doesn't include either of these APIs. (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/wifiaware/building-peer-to-peer-apps) Looking at the sample code for AccessorySetupKit (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/accessorysetupkit/setting-up-and-authorizing-a-bluetooth-accessory) there is only an example using Bluetooth. And the AccessorySetupKit APIs don't yet document how Wi-Fi Aware is used or how one sets up the Info.plist with the appropriate keys. Can Apple update its example code to fill in these gaps or point me to documentation that can fill in these gaps? It is hard to develop an understanding of the capabilities of these APIs when they are so poorly documented. Thanks for any help, Smith

We are having an issue with the Local Network permission pop-up not getting triggered for our apps that need to communicate with devices via local network interfaces/addresses. As we understand, apps using UDP should trigger this, causing macOS to prompt for access, or, if denied, fail to connect. However, we are facing issues with macOS not prompting this popup at all. Here are important and related points: Our application is packaged as a .app package and distributed independently (not on the App Store). The application controls hardware that we manufacture. In order to find the hardware on the network, we send a UDP broadcast with a message for our hardware on the local network, and the hardware responds with a message back. However, the popup (to ask for permission) never shows up. The application is not able to find the hardware device. It is interesting to note that data is still sent out to the network (without the popup) but we receive back the wrong data. The behaviour is consistent macOS Sequoia (and above) with both Apple And Intel silicon. Workarounds that have been tried: Manual Authorization: One solution suggested in various blogs was to go to "Settings → Privacy and Security-> Local network", find your application and grant access. However, the application never shows up in the list here. Firewall: No difference is seen in behaviour with firewall being ON OR OFF. Setting NSLocalNetworkUsageDescription: We have also tried setting the Info.plist adding the NSLocalNetworkUsageDescription with a meaningful string and updating the NSBonjourServices. Running Via terminal (WORKS): Running the application via terminal sees no issues. The application runs correctly and is able to send UDP and receive correct data (and find the devices on the network). But this is not an appropriate solution. How can we get this bug/issue fixed in macOS Sequoia (and above)? Are there any other solutions/workarounds that we can try on our end?

From time to time the subject of NECP grows up, both here on DevForums and in DTS cases. I’ve posted about this before but I wanted to collect those tidbits into single coherent post. If you have questions or comments, start a new thread in the App & System Services > Networking subtopic and tag it with Network Extension. That way I’ll be sure to see it go by. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com" A Peek Behind the NECP Curtain NECP stands for Network Extension Control Protocol. It’s a subsystem within the Apple networking stack that controls which programs have access to which network interfaces. It’s vitally important to the Network Extension subsystem, hence the name, but it’s used in many different places. Indeed, a very familiar example of its use is the Settings > Mobile Data [1] user interface on iOS. NECP has no explicit API, although there are APIs that are offer some insight into its state. Continuing the Settings > Mobile Data example above, there is a little-known API, CTCellularData in the Core Telephony framework, that returns whether your app has access to WWAN. Despite having no API, NECP is still relevant to developers. The Settings > Mobile Data example is one place where it affects app developers but it’s most important for Network Extension (NE) developers. A key use case for NECP is to prevent VPN loops. When starting an NE provider, the system configures the NECP policy for the NE provider’s process to prevent it from using a VPN interface. This means that you can safely open a network connection inside your VPN provider without having to worry about its traffic being accidentally routed back to you. This is why, for example, an NE packet tunnel provider can use any networking API it wants, including BSD Sockets, to run its connection without fear of creating a VPN loop [1]. One place that NECP shows up regularly is the system log. Next time you see a system log entry like this: type: debug time: 15:02:54.817903+0000 process: Mail subsystem: com.apple.network category: connection message: nw_protocol_socket_set_necp_attributes [C723.1.1:1] setsockopt 39 SO_NECP_ATTRIBUTES … you’ll at least know what the necp means (-: Finally, a lot of NECP infrastructure is in the Darwin open source. As with all things in Darwin, it’s fine to poke around and see how your favourite feature works, but do not incorporate any information you find into your product. Stuff you uncover by looking in Darwin is not considered API. [1] Settings > Cellular Data if you speak American (-: [2] Network Extension providers can call the createTCPConnection(to:enableTLS:tlsParameters:delegate:) method to create an NWTCPConnection [3] that doesn’t run through the tunnel. You can use that if it’s convenient but you don’t need to use it. [3] NWTCPConnection is now deprecated, but there are non-deprecated equivalents. For the full story, see NWEndpoint History and Advice. Revision History 2025-12-12 Replaced “macOS networking stack” with “Apple networking stack” to avoid giving the impression that this is all about macOS. Added a link to NWEndpoint History and Advice. Made other minor editorial changes. 2023-02-27 First posted.

Hello team, Would this mean that content filters intended for all browsing can only be implemented for managed devices using MDM? My goal would be to create a content filtering app for all users, regardless of if their device is managed/supervised. thanks.